Bill

BILL • US SENATE

SJRES 154

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B); Revocations or Unfavorable Changes to the Terms of Existing Credit Arrangements".

119th Congress
Introduced by Cory Booker,

Disapproves BCFP rule that would remove notice requirements, keeping lenders obligated to inform borrowers before altering credit terms.

Introduced in Senate
0
0
Bill Summary • SJRES 154

Joint Resolution S.J. RES. 154

“Congressional disapproval of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection rule withdrawing the Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B) rule on revocations or unfavorable changes to terms of existing credit arrangements.”


1. Purpose & Intent

  • Core Goal: Disapprove, under Chapter 8 of Title 5 U.S. C. Code, a recent rule proposed by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) that would withdraw an earlier regulation governing how lenders may alter the terms of already‑issued credit arrangements (e.g., borrower‑lender agreements).
  • Practical Effect: By disapproving the withdrawal rule, Congress would effectively retain the existing Regulation B provision that protects consumers from arbitrary revocations or adverse changes to credit terms.

2. Key Provisions of the Resolved Action

Senate Proposal What It(s) Affects
Disapproval of the BCFP rule – specifically 87 Fed. Reg. 30097 (May 18 2022) and 90 Fed. Reg. 20084 (May 12 2025) Maintains the current rule that requires lenders to give notice of any revocation or unfavorable modification to the terms of a credit arrangement.
Reference to Chapter 8 Congress votes to disapprove the rule; if approved, the rule can be effective only until the next federal government is formed.
Referral Sent to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs for consideration.

3. Who is Affected

Stakeholder Impact
Creditors and Lenders Continue to be bound by the existing notice and procedural requirements for changing credit terms; cannot retroactively eliminate those obligations.
Borrowers Maintain protection against sudden or unfair changes to their credit contracts, such as pre‑payment penalties or term modifications.
Consumer Financial Protection Agency Stays subject to the pre‑existing regulatory framework; cannot rely on the withdrawn rule.
Financial Regulators No shift in supervisory expectations regarding changes to credit terms.

4. Procedural & Timeline Highlights

  1. Introduced: March 26 2026 (Senator Cory Booker).
  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on the same day.
  3. Next steps: Committee action, possible hearings, amendments, and eventual vote in both chambers.
  4. Effectiveness: If passed, the resolution will cancel the BCFP’s attempt to withdraw the rule, keeping current consumer‑protection standards in place.

5. Bottom Line

SJRES 154 seeks to keep the door open for consumers, requiring lenders to give notice before altering credit terms. It is a straightforward disapproval of a rule that would have removed such protections. If enacted, the existing Regulation B provisions governing revocations or unfavorable changes to terms of existing credit arrangements will continue unchanged.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for SJRES 154. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat