Bill

BILL • US SENATE

SJRES 96

A joint resolution requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period beginning on December 31, 2025, and ending on January 5, 2026.

119th Congress
Introduced by Shelley Moore Capito, Lisa Murkowski, Alex Padilla and 1 other co-sponsors

Congress requests Interior Secretary to approve special, temporary display arrangements on National Mall and Washington Monument from Dec 31, 2025–Jan 5, 2026, bypassing normal permit procedures.

Introduced in Senate
0
0
Bill Summary • SJRES 96

Legislative bill overview

SJRES 96 requests that the Secretary of the Interior authorize special, temporary arrangements for displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument between December 31, 2025, and January 5, 2026. This is a joint resolution—a non-binding request rather than legislation that changes law. The resolution targets a specific six-day window, suggesting it relates to New Year's Eve/Day celebrations and potentially a presidential inauguration period (January 20, 2025, falls outside this window, though transition events may occur).

Why is this important

The National Mall and Washington Monument are heavily regulated federal spaces with strict rules governing what displays, structures, and events can occur. This resolution would bypass normal permitting and authorization procedures for a limited timeframe, potentially allowing displays or installations that wouldn't normally be permitted. The bipartisan sponsorship (two Democrats, two Republicans) suggests this may relate to official government celebrations or commemorative events during a sensitive political transition period.

Potential points of contention

  • Precedent concerns: Authorizing "unique and one-time arrangements" that circumvent standard federal regulations could establish precedent for future special exemptions and reduce the consistency of rules governing public spaces
  • Lack of specificity: The resolution doesn't specify what displays or arrangements are being requested, making it impossible to evaluate whether they're appropriate uses of federal monuments and grounds
  • Transparency questions: The vague language and narrow timeframe raise questions about what specific event or display prompted this request and whether the public understands what they're approving

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for SJRES 96. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat