Bill
Sponsor avatar

BILL โ€ข US HOUSE

HR 3297

Interstate Obscenity Definition Act

119th Congress
Introduced by Mary Miller,

HR 3297 establishes a statutory definition of obscenity for visual media and removes the requirement to prove intent to harass when prosecuting the transmission of such materials.

Introduced in House
0
0
Bill Summary ยท HR 3297

Legislative Summary: H.R. 3297 - Interstate Obscenity Definition Act

Overview

The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (H.R. 3297) is a legislative proposal designed to standardize the definition of "obscenity" within the Communications Act of 1934. The bill primarily seeks to establish a specific legal threshold for what constitutes obscene visual material and modifies the requirements for prosecuting obscene or harassing communications sent via interstate or foreign channels.

Purpose and Intent

The primary intent of this bill is to provide a clear, statutory definition of "obscenity" as it applies to visual media. By codifying these criteria into the Communications Act, the bill aims to create a consistent legal framework for evaluating whether images, films, or digital files are obscene, rather than relying solely on judicial precedents or varying interpretations across different jurisdictions.

Key Provisions

1. Statutory Definition of Obscenity

The bill amends Section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 to define "obscene" or "obscenity" specifically concerning visual depictions (including pictures, graphic image files, films, and videotapes). For a piece of media to be classified as obscene under this Act, it must meet three specific criteria:
* Prurient Interest: Taken as a whole, the material must appeal to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion.
* Sexual Content and Intent: It must depict or represent actual or simulated sexual acts, sexual contact, or lewd exhibition of genitals, with the objective intent to arouse, titillate, or gratify sexual desires.
* Lack of Value: Taken as a whole, the material must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The bill further clarifies that the terms "sexual act" and "sexual contact" are to be defined according to existing federal law (18 U.S.C. ยง 2246).

2. Modification of Communication Offenses

The bill amends Section 223(a)(1)(A) of the Communications Act. Specifically, it removes the phrase ", with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass another person" from the section regarding obscene or harassing telephone calls/communications.

By striking this language, the bill effectively lowers the prosecutorial burden; the government would no longer need to prove a specific intent to "abuse, threaten, or harass" to establish a violation regarding the transmission of obscene materials.

Who is Affected?

  • Content Creators and Distributors: Individuals or organizations that produce and transmit visual media via interstate or foreign communications.
  • Law Enforcement and Prosecutors: Federal agencies responsible for enforcing communications laws will have a specific statutory definition to apply when charging individuals for the transmission of obscene materials.
  • Users of Communication Services: Individuals utilizing telephone or internet services for the transmission of visual data.

Procedural Status

  • Introduced: May 8, 2025
  • Current Status: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • Sponsorship: Co-sponsored by Rep. Mary Miller.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for HR 3297. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat

Start the Conversation

Be the first to share your thoughts on this petition. Your voice matters!

Share your opinion above