Bill
Sponsor avatar

BILL • US SENATE

S 1994

Protecting Community Television Act

119th Congress
Introduced by Tammy Baldwin, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker and 16 other co-sponsors

The Protecting Community Television Act clarifies the definition of franchise fees to prevent cable companies from diverting funds away from local governments and community TV chan

Introduced in Senate
0
0
Bill Summary · S 1994

Legislative Summary: Protecting Community Television Act (S. 1994)

Overview

The Protecting Community Television Act (S. 1994) is a targeted piece of legislation introduced in the 119th Congress. Its primary purpose is to refine the legal definition of a "franchise fee" within the Communications Act of 1934. While the bill is brief, it seeks to close legal loopholes that may allow cable operators to divert funds away from community television and local government infrastructure.

Main Purpose and Intent

The bill aims to prevent cable companies from reclassifying fees that should be treated as "franchise fees" into other types of payments. Under current law, franchise fees are payments made by cable operators to local governments in exchange for the right to use public rights-of-way to provide cable services.

By narrowing the definition of these fees, the bill intends to ensure that these funds remain available for their intended purpose: supporting local community initiatives, including Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) access channels.

Key Provisions

The bill makes two specific technical amendments to Section 622(g)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 542(g)(1)):

  1. Definition Precision: It replaces the word "includes" with "means" when defining a franchise fee. In legislative drafting, "includes" is often interpreted as illustrative (allowing for other things to be added to the definition), whereas "means" creates an exhaustive and definitive list.
  2. Clarification of Assessments: It inserts the phrase "other monetary" before the word "assessment." This change is designed to clearly categorize franchise fees as monetary obligations, reducing the ambiguity that cable operators might use to argue that certain charges are not subject to franchise fee regulations.

Affected Parties

  • Cable Operators: Companies providing cable services will be subject to a stricter, more definitive legal definition of what constitutes a franchise fee, potentially limiting their ability to restructure payments to avoid these fees.
  • Local Governments: Municipalities may see more consistent and predictable revenue streams from cable franchises.
  • Community Television (PEG Channels): Local public, educational, and government access channels—which often rely on franchise-related funding—are the primary intended beneficiaries of this protection.

Procedural Status

  • Introduced: June 9, 2025
  • Current Status: The bill has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
  • Sponsorship: Introduced by Senator Ed Markey and co-sponsored by a broad coalition of Democratic senators.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for S 1994. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat

Start the Conversation

Be the first to share your thoughts on this petition. Your voice matters!

Share your opinion above