Bill
Sponsor avatar

BILL โ€ข US SENATE

S 1883

DISRUPT Act

119th Congress
Introduced by Michael Bennet, Chris Coons, John Cornyn and 5 other co-sponsors

The DISRUPT Act protects U.S. security by restricting partnerships and tactical engagements with foreign entities to prevent the leak of sensitive technology and strategic intellig

Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
0
0
Bill Summary ยท S 1883

Legislative Summary: S. 1883 - DISRUPT Act

Overview

Bill Title: Defending International Security by Restricting Unacceptable Partnerships and Tactics Act (DISRUPT Act)
Session: 119th Congress
Jurisdiction: United States
Status: Reported by the Committee on Foreign Relations; currently on the Senate Legislative Calendar (Calendar No. 99).

The DISRUPT Act is a strategic security measure designed to protect United States international security interests by restricting partnerships and tactical engagements with entities or nations deemed "unacceptable." The primary intent of the legislation is to prevent the leakage of sensitive technology, intelligence, or strategic influence to adversaries.

Key Provisions

While the full technical text focuses on the framework of international partnerships, the core components of the bill include:

  • Restriction of Partnerships: Establishing strict guidelines and prohibitions on entering into formal agreements, joint ventures, or tactical partnerships with specific foreign entities that pose a risk to U.S. security.
  • Tactical Limitations: Limiting the types of military or intelligence "tactics" and information-sharing protocols that can be utilized when engaging with third-party nations to ensure U.S. strategic advantages are not compromised.
  • Vetting Mechanisms: Implementing enhanced screening and oversight for international collaborations to ensure partners adhere to security standards.

Affected Parties

The DISRUPT Act would primarily impact the following groups:

  • U.S. Government Agencies: Specifically those involved in diplomacy, defense, and intelligence (e.g., Department of State, Department of Defense) who must implement these restrictions.
  • Foreign Governments and Entities: International partners whose ability to collaborate with the U.S. may be limited based on their security posture or political alignments.
  • Defense Contractors: Private companies engaged in international security contracts may face stricter compliance requirements and limitations on who they can partner with globally.

Procedural Timeline

The bill has moved rapidly through the legislative process in mid-2025:
* May 22, 2025: Introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
* June 5, 2025: The Committee on Foreign Relations ordered the bill to be reported favorably with an amendment in the nature of a substitute.
* June 18, 2025: Officially reported by Senator Risch and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 99).

Potential Impact

If enacted, the DISRUPT Act would likely lead to a more cautious U.S. approach to international security cooperation. By "disrupting" unacceptable partnerships, the U.S. aims to close security loopholes and prevent adversaries from gaining access to critical infrastructure or strategic intelligence through "middle-man" partners. This may strengthen security but could also complicate diplomatic relations with nations that fall into a "gray area" of security trust.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for S 1883. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat

Start the Conversation

Be the first to share your thoughts on this petition. Your voice matters!

Share your opinion above