Bill
Sponsor avatar

BILL โ€ข US SENATE

S 98

Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress
Introduced by Shelley Moore Capito, John Curtis, Amy Klobuchar and 1 other co-sponsors

The Rural Broadband Protection Act requires the FCC to vet the technical and financial capacity of companies receiving rural broadband subsidies to ensure projects are completed.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
0
0
Bill Summary ยท S 98

Legislative Summary: Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025 (S. 98)

Overview

The Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025 is a legislative measure designed to improve the accountability and reliability of broadband deployment in rural areas. The bill directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to establish a rigorous vetting process for companies applying for high-cost funding through the Universal Service Fund (USF).

The primary intent of the bill is to ensure that government subsidies are awarded to providers who possess the actual technical and financial capacity to complete their projects, thereby preventing "gamesmanship" and reducing the number of defaulted projects that leave rural communities without promised internet access.

Key Provisions

1. Mandatory Vetting Process

The bill requires the FCC to initiate a rulemaking proceeding within 180 days of enactment to create a formal vetting process for "new covered funding awards." To qualify for funding, applicants must provide detailed documentation proving they have:
* Technical Capability: The expertise to deploy the proposed network.
* Financial Stability: The funding and resources necessary to complete the project.
* Operational Capacity: The ability to deliver services that meet the FCC's performance requirements.
* A Reasonable Business Plan: A viable strategy for the long-term operation of the network.

2. Evaluation Standards

The FCC is mandated to evaluate these proposals based on:
* Established Standards: Using recognized technical, financial, and operational benchmarks (specifically citing standards used in Digital Opportunity Data Collection).
* Performance History: Reviewing the applicant's track record of compliance with previous FCC and other government broadband funding programs.

3. Strict Penalties for Defaults

To discourage non-serious bidders and protect public funds, the bill establishes minimum penalties for "pre-authorization defaults" (where a winner cannot fulfill their pledge before receiving funds):
* Minimum Fine: At least $9,000 per violation.
* Base Forfeiture: The penalty may not be limited to less than 30% of the applicant's total support unless the FCC demonstrates a specific need for a lower penalty.

Affected Parties

  • Broadband Providers: Companies seeking federal subsidies for rural network deployment will face stricter application requirements and higher financial risks if they fail to deliver.
  • The FCC: The Commission is tasked with creating and enforcing these new rules.
  • Rural Residents: The bill aims to benefit rural communities by reducing the likelihood that a provider wins a bid but fails to actually build the promised infrastructure.

Procedural Timeline and Impact

  • Legislative Status: The bill passed both the Senate (June 26, 2025) and the House of Representatives (April 20, 2026).
  • Implementation: Once enacted, the FCC has 180 days to begin the rulemaking process.
  • Fiscal Impact: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates a negligible net cost to the government, as the FCC can offset administrative costs through its existing fee collection authority. Additionally, the increased penalties are expected to generate a small amount of revenue for the Treasury.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for S 98. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat

Start the Conversation

Be the first to share your thoughts on this petition. Your voice matters!

Share your opinion above