Bill
Sponsor avatar

BILL • US HOUSE

HR 2184

Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025

119th Congress
Introduced by Andy Barr, Aaron Bean, Andy Biggs and 20 other co-sponsors

The Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025 mandates 30-day court hearings for NICS record disputes and requires the government to prove an individual is ineligible for a firear

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-338.
0
0
Bill Summary · HR 2184

Bill Summary: Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025 (H.R. 2184)

Overview

The Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025 aims to provide stronger legal Protections and expedited judicial relief for individuals who are denied the purchase of a firearm due to inaccurate records within the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). The bill focuses on establishing strict timelines for court hearings and shifting the burden of proof to the government in cases of erroneous denials.

Main Purpose and Intent

The primary intent of the bill is to ensure that law-abiding citizens are not deprived of their Second Amendment rights due to bureaucratic errors or delays in the NICS correction process. The legislation asserts that the deprivation of the right to bear arms requires due process and that current mechanisms for correcting records lack sufficient enforcement to ensure timely resolution.

Key Provisions

1. Expedited Judicial Process

The bill amends 18 U.S.C. § 925A to create a more aggressive timeline for legal challenges:
* 30-Day Hearing Mandate: Once a lawsuit is filed challenging the accuracy of NICS records or alleging a violation of the 60-day correction deadline, the court must hold a hearing within 30 days.
* Burden of Proof: The burden of proof is placed on the respondent (the government entity or agency responsible for the record). The government must prove by "clear and convincing evidence" that the individual is actually ineligible to possess a firearm.

2. Legal Remedies and Attorney Fees

To encourage the correction of erroneous records, the bill mandates that the court assess reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs against the government respondent if the complainant "substantially prevails." A complainant is considered to have substantially prevailed if they obtain:
* A judicial order.
* An enforceable written agreement or consent decree.
* A voluntary change in position by the U.S. government.

3. FBI Reporting Requirements

The Director of the FBI is required to submit an annual report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees detailing:
* The total number of challenges to NICS record accuracy.
* How many challenges were processed to final disposition.
* The number of initial determinations that were reversed versus sustained.
* The average processing time for these challenges.

Who is Affected?

  • Prospective Firearm Purchasers: Individuals who have been denied a firearm purchase due to a NICS background check and believe the denial is based on incorrect data (e.g., mistaken identity or outdated records).
  • The FBI and Department of Justice: The agencies responsible for operating NICS and processing appeals.
  • State and Local Governments: Any political subdivision of a state that provides erroneous information to the federal system.
  • Federal Courts: Courts will be required to prioritize these hearings on their dockets within the 30-day window.

Procedural and Financial Impact

  • Timeline: The bill sets a strict 30-day window for hearings following a legal action.
  • Budgetary Impact: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the increase in direct spending (primarily for legal fees paid by the federal government) would be less than $500,000 over the 2025–2035 period. Administrative costs for the annual report are expected to be insignificant.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for HR 2184. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat

Start the Conversation

Be the first to share your thoughts on this petition. Your voice matters!

Share your opinion above